ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1999-01521 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: The applicant was discharged from the Regular Air Force on 16 Jul 97 for a pattern of misconduct, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. He received three Records of Individual Counseling, a Letter of Reprimand, and an Article 15, and was placed on the Unfavorable Information File. Additionally, the applicant failed his Career Development Course End of Course examination twice. On 17 Sep 99, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered the applicant’s request to upgrade his general discharge to honorable; however, they denied his request concluding that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant was provided full due process. On 23 Feb 00, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his general discharge stating the facts and opinions given by the AFDRB were based on the evidence of record and were not rebutted by the applicant. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. By DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record Under the Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552, dated 14 Sep 12, the applicant requests reconsideration of his request. The applicant takes full responsibility for his actions while serving in the Air Force; however, he does not believe it should prohibit him from returning to serve in the military. In a separate letter to the Board, the applicant states that it has been well over 15 years since his release from active service and since being discharged he has grown in character as a person, and strengthened his resolve and standing as a contributor and leader as a citizen to the United States. He is currently an on-site manager with a recruiting agency who manages over 160 employees. He has performed civil service work assisting disadvantaged youth and received his bachelors’ degree. In support of the appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement and several letters of support. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to warrant corrective action of the applicant’s request to have his discharge upgraded to honorable. After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of this appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in the previous Board decision. The letters of support and his educational achievement are noted; however, we do not find this evidence sufficient to warrant favorable consideration. Accordingly, his request is not favorably considered. 2. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issue involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board reconsidered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-1999-01521 in Executive Session on 6 Dec 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following additional documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 8 Mar 00, w/atchs. Exhibit F. DD Form 149, Applicant, dated 14 Sep 12, w/atchs. Panel Chair